RE: Q: do you, Christian, claim that God exists, rather than you believe that he exists?
February 24, 2014 at 10:56 pm
(February 24, 2014 at 10:33 pm)discipulus Wrote:(February 24, 2014 at 10:31 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Fair enough. So a willing person who judges the evidence to be too weak to adopt Christian belief is condemned by your loving god, or do they get a mulligan for good intentions?
A person is condemned because they reject God's offer of salvation found only in the person of Christ.
What burden of responsibility and measure of condemnation then does the believer who fails to present adequate reasons for belief bear? Any? Is it really only on the person who rejects the claims, in spite of their willingness to listen impartially? So weak evidence can never be weak evidence? Irreversible guilt accrues for exercising honest skepticism? Nice system you have there.