(February 27, 2014 at 5:42 am)Alice Wrote:(February 27, 2014 at 12:32 am)Napoléon Wrote: It's more than that and you know it.
Is it? Do I?
Quote:Completing such a simple task would render the OP completely bollocks. At first I wasn't expecting it to have any success at all, but the more xtians like frods resist the more the point is made.
The point that people don't like to be manipulated?
I wouldn't do it, Nappykinz, and I'm not even a Christian.
Most people don't respond to 'jump, wimp' with 'how high?'.
Quote:We're also not talking about rape. We're talking about words. There's a bit of a difference between asking someone to say something that's a bit hurtful and going out and raping and traumatising someone else.
Yeah, you think I of all people don't know that?Have you forgotten that I often show an extreme example (following the same basis) to demonstrate why something is not reasonable?
Don't get caught up on the contents: there's a messed up formulae.
Would it make you happier if I just straight up called it 'bullying'?
Alice, isn't bullying nonconsensual whereas Christians are here on an atheist forum consensually?
-the white rabbit-
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.




Have you forgotten that I often show an extreme example (following the same basis) to demonstrate why something is not reasonable? 