One thing I find humorously striking about Libertarians is their reductionist ideas.
You don't hear "let's minimize the differences between X and Y so we may consider removing something"
Instead you get grand standing statements like "Remove X" or "Abolish Y"
In the end run, it feels like you have a solution looking for a problem.
And the complex tax code seems a more pressing issue than the legal institution of marriage (which has substantial rules devoted to joining and splitting of shared property and resources).
You don't hear "let's minimize the differences between X and Y so we may consider removing something"
Instead you get grand standing statements like "Remove X" or "Abolish Y"
In the end run, it feels like you have a solution looking for a problem.
And the complex tax code seems a more pressing issue than the legal institution of marriage (which has substantial rules devoted to joining and splitting of shared property and resources).
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
