Would any of you drive a car made by Darwin's ideas?

[Esquilax]

You guys seem to have missed the foundation of Darwin's theory.
That RANDOM changes occured over time.
Random means "Chance" and chance is the opposite of choice.
Chance is having no intellegence added.
The development of all tech. is the result of applied intellegence.
Even the Pinto.
You can call development that we do "Evolution" but that is not what darwin proposed.

So, to be clear, you began this conversation without allowing yourself to accept any evidence we presented, because people would still be involved? Could you be any more dishonest?

As has been pointed out to you more than once now, the changes made in the evolutionary algorithms I linked you to are random, they're just simulated rather than appearing at the speed of individual generations. All that happens after is that the selection pressures- which are not random even in nature- are inputted by people, whereas in nature they would be a matter of the environment and surrounding context of the organism in question. So, even taking your rather ludicrous oversimplification into account, what I showed you still passes.

You know, I'm no expert at argumentation or anything, but I think this unorthodox method of yours, where you display with every word you say that you know nothing of what you're debating, and haven't bothered to so much as look over the information given you by your opponents, isn't working out.

Perhaps you should try debating from a position of knowledge, rather than continuing to show us how proud you are of your profound ignorance?