Lets compile a list of everything wrong with christ-insanity

[Bad Writer]

Debate eliminates the fluff...

This is demonstrably wrong. Ever heard of a guy named Ken Ham? Yeah...no.

...[debate] forces two people with opposing views on a specific topic to reason soundly...

A dishonest approach to an issue remains dishonest whether it's in a debate or in a group discussion. In fact, I would argue that a one-on-one leaves less of a chance for the dishonest tactician to be called out on his bullshit, as the opposing side isn't always trying to nitpick his opponent's tactics.

...and facilitates the communication of thought by fostering a distraction free environment.

You did very well showing me that there was such a thing as "metaphysical naturalism". Communication was not hindered in regards to this revelation. Do you have any examples of how we can trust that a "distraction free environment" would facilitate a type of communication that we cannot attain in any normal discussion? So far, we have pointed out many instances of your dishonesty while speaking to us; what could possibly make us believe that a one-on-one debate would be any different?

P.s.

You can PM whenever you want and I will respond as graciously and as sincerely as I can.

Noted. Truth be told, I won't bother. Why? There is little point discussing anything with someone whose go-to responses are recitations of the inane. What guarantee would I have that someone as demonstrably close-minded as you would ever partake in an honest, one-on-one discourse excluding your word that you will "respond as graciously and as sincerely" as you can? Actions speak louder than words, buddy.