The first Christians weren't Bible Christians

[Phatt Matt s]

The Bible not to mention Christianity is based in Jewish Mysticism--the Kabbalah which is metaphysical in nature--all based on numbers (numerology) psychological archetypes (tarot and astrology) and how those are expressed in our lives. Metaphysics means comprehensive physics based mostly on numbers and psychology. If you have a very well versed education in metaphysics you will notice the Bible is all written metaphysical terms not literal ones.


Most of the Bible clearly express what Christians refer to as witchcraft and dark craft elsewhere but don't notice it in their own bibles because they decry metaphysics as occult arts or devil worship. So are not educated in it. Are ignorant of the fact they are reading a book they would consider a book of shadows if that book was called anything but the bible. The Bible itself admits to this is. There's been no deception in that respect.

If you asked any Christian if they would smite their neighbor they'd say no . But the US stating itself to be a Christian nation..well I think every country has noticed the US spend a lot of time smiting its neighbor. Of course we don't burn bulls in sacrifice anymore we just burn down entire civilizations ....

Milk for babies, meat for strong men which means belief systems of any sort are for un-self developed people. Beliefs are milk. Like milk people just swallow beliefs, it nourishes babies. We know that. Scientifically babies need milk...Adults don't really. We can get what milk provides from food that babies can't eat. Like cheese. Meat is spiritual precepts that one has to chew on a bit. Something babies can't do. And meat may be tough, may not taste good, may be challenging, hard to swallow.... But meat is responsible for a great many things like growth, and strength. That's metaphysics right there. A comprehensive way of observing something (instead of just swallowing it ). What religion is composed of is a great many unselfdeveloped people. Spiritually immature? Who could tell. But you can observe they are Emotionally immature--not self developed on an emotional level. Children believe in Santa Clause, adults believe in an entity called God who for all intents and purposes appears to be a grown up version of Santa Claus--he's got a list, he's checking it twice, gonna find out whose naughty or nice. If you aren't nice you get a piece of coal..coal burns by the way..like hell.

Nonetheless people will choose the Santa God story because because ..its comforting . How? How some omnipotent angry and unstable entity looking over your life is comforting is beyond me. We wouldn't willfully choose a rather limited human being to partner with but yet who would choose an allpowerful entity of that nature to partner with. Someone under a spell. Someone under hypnosis or otherwise in some altered state of consciousness.


Since no one studies metaphysics anymore (not to be confused with new age bs, which is reupholstered Christianity) no one knows what the Bible is composed of. Insanely enough, Christians don't know its a spell book. It says so right in there. "I"M A spell book. Go-SPEL. Spells (spel in old english) are usually hypnotic in nature-hypnosis depends on scripts. The bible states plainly that its SCRIPT-ures. A book of spells. Books of spells are used to ..cast spells. This is what the bible is telling ...go look at the bible its never been dishonest about this.....who can't see it. People who are under a spell.


Why can't Christians see this when its plainly written in the bible....because the spells are doing what intended. They are under a spell. You can't say the bible is not a functional article, its working all too well for its intended purpose.

Jesus did say , Forgiven them they have no idea what they are doing. Hard to argue with that.

To people who are literate and educated...its simply a means of knowing how people are brainwashed (to use a modern word).

Atheism is a step up from that undeveloped self. A leap of consciousness the breaking of the spel. You might not get it yet..or have all the answers but the first thing you notice is its like waking from a spel. And that people who can't get out from under it..act like they are walking under a spell. There's lots of anger there especially when you look how much damage is caused by three nearly identical religions Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. I can't blame them for that but then again its wasted anger, angry at something that doesn't exist. Just a spel, a story. The Bible says so itself.

And if you given even a cursory once over Christians don't even believe in their own faith. It's not a faith or belief system....

Maybe its the hypocrisy that makes people--atheists--angry.

For the person who is interpreting the bible in its correct terms.....its simply a means of knowing how undeveloped people are controlled.

Welcome to our forum and I'm honored and flattered that your first post was on my thread. THanks for the Gem Sunshine!

---

Interesting Arac:

for some other balance, I was reviewing Dogherty, found misgivingly; and Dawkins and a Hawkins and jung:
then the likes of Derek Prince and his scholarship from King's... and CS Lewis.

Just seems if i were to build a called-out group,
it would be more than on just some one named 'pebbley' or 'stoney' or called then Petros;
but
would 'build' on a knowledge called petra, "rock"... of some direct connective
-other than that of which-
mis-historicals, and mis-interpretors, and other human-heart-thinking-centers could- if they could- merely disuay

---

That recorded conversation of Peter with Jesus asking
"Who do you say that I am?"
-so to understand simply,
but Jesus' seemed-awareness of how Peter knew to be "built" on other knowledge about Jesus on Earth, not passed on by humans;
and later seems even more so, respecting Paul in this as recorded scripture Col 2:9 ; I Cor 3:17; Titus: "Great Savior God" (lit Grk) Jesus, himself and other writ; "...Lord is the spirit (some 'Spirit' transliterated).

re: OP it would seem "I will write it on their hearts" was being fulfilled of a whole Hebraic 'law'

Could I please get the opinion of everyone who reads this brilliant piece as to what is wrong with the poster? I thought I had problems. Good grief!