(March 29, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Like I already stated, I'm fine with the answer "I don't know", but you insist upon posting irrelevant links. Also the since it can't be explained scientifically it can be defined as supernatural.(bold mine)
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/supernatural
su·per·nat·u·ral adjective \ˌsü-pər-ˈna-chə-rəl, -ˈnach-rəl\
: unable to be explained by science or the laws of nature : of, relating to, or seeming to come from magic, a god, etc.
Who has ever said that the origins of the universe are unable to be explained by science? Are you seriously stating that it is beyond the realm of science to examine the origins of the universe? What allows you to make this claim? Like I and everyone else has said, just because something hasn't been explained by science doesn't mean that it cannot be explained by science. Are you so desperate about being wrong that you have to define words and concepts differently in order to make your points? Sad, really.
(March 29, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: you asked for proof, my point was that if Jesus himself couldn't prove himself to be the messiah, what makes you think I could do any better. Is there evidence? yes. But what I may accept as enough evidence, you may not.Clearly.
(March 29, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I haven't started one thread on these forums. And I restrict myself to the christianity sub forumThen why ask the question that started this thread of discussion? Are you ust trolling, then?
(March 29, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Actually my analogy was perfect, sorry it went over your head.No. It wasn't. And since I explained why it wasn't and you just responded with "neener neener," I'll take that as confirmation of your intellectual density.
(March 29, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Did you forget what you wrote? Here let me refresh you memory.It is so frustrating to even discuss with people who are so intellectually dishonest. I feel like your only recourse when you match wits with someone is to be as obtuse as possible until they give up because you are not worth the time and effort, then claim victory.
(March 28, 2014 at 12:32 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: I sure can begin to dispute something for which there is no evidence. You are showing your profound ignorance on every level.
If you are not the dumbest person on the planet, you'd know that I was talking about the evidence for the assertion that the crop circle was left by aliens, not that there was simply zero evidence for anything. That wouldn't make sense at all as an analogy.
(March 29, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: The discussion has always been about no evidence. But since you seem confused let's make it simple. can you say with absolute certainty that there is no God?Hah. Confused. Please don't give yourself that kind of credit. You do not deserve it.
Yes or no?
Nope. I cannot say with absolute certainty that anything doesn't exist. There is NO WAY TO PROVE A NEGATIVE. Can you say with absolute certainty that there isn't a 40 lb pollywog living in the methane lakes on Titan?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
