A fined tuned argument.....Heywood style.

[Alex K]

Ok, you just systematically removed your hypothesis from testability because you proclaim that it does not make any predictions as to how the universe looks, and you think this somehow strengthens your hypothesis, but it doesn't. If hypothesis A makes no prediction for a certain observation, but hypothesis B does, and observations match the predictions of hypothesis B, then B is to be favored over A at least with respect to these data.

Since the multiverse hypothesis can explain anything....it really explains nothing.

Can it? I earlier linked to a mutliverse paper where the authors make a prediction, namely that parameters should be pushed towards catastrophic boundaries in parameter space by the a priori probability distribution. We live in such a universe, and the recent Higgs boson discovery has provided us with yet another instance where this seems to be the case