(April 5, 2014 at 9:40 pm)Heywood Wrote:(April 5, 2014 at 7:04 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: I still don't understand why "IT SEEMS SO INCREDIBLE TO ME" is something that requires an additional fundamental law beyond the sketch of an explanation provided by physics and its respective branches.
When did anyone say, "It seems so incredible to me"? Look, there is a problem that demands an explanation. Why is it that 20 some odd constants of nature seem to sit on a knife edge. There is no reason to think that the universe would just be benevolent toward emergent complexity and concoct this situation.
The multiverse explains it....but so does an intelligent creator. You really have 3 options.
1)bury your head in the sand and hope the problem goes away.
2)accept the multiverse model as plausible even though there are no observations of it.
3)accept the intelligent creator model as plausible even though there are no observations of it.
I am open to 2 and 3.
You left out the possibility that it could be no other way.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
