(April 13, 2014 at 4:58 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(April 12, 2014 at 3:29 pm)Brakeman Wrote: So "Shaykh," have you ever actually communicated with god?
If so, can you describe the form and substance of his reply?
Debating believers of all religions is like working at the DMV, all of them think they can drive, and they all think their different cars make them special, but you still end up telling them all to get in line and take a number. When you finally inspect their claims that they deserve a license you realize they have never studied the drivers manual(how logic works), and every time you give them the eye exam they always see letters that spell out their pet god claim. Then they all get pissed when you give them a failing grade.
Not how it works exactly because you described the common atheist. You seem to be doing very little int he cases of logic and reason and the last time I heard people discuss this philosophically it makes no sense. You lack the ability to apply logic to all claims because there are things you cannot answer and the same goes for me. Because I conclude that a God exist makes me very unspecial since theism i the majority. You keep shooting yourself int he foot with your claims and continuously assume too much of me. Hell people still think I am a Muslim at this point.
Your logic is 0 and you ability to quantify claims and measure them by units of truth is bias as you do not take note of your own absurdities.
In short, you are an idiot since not only are you bias but you make claims and do nothing to support them but conclude that you can.
I said it before I even made this thread that I am very bad at arguing the existence of god when it comes to objective(a posteriori or empirical) claims. I do not even believe that god is universally valid in existence so how the fuck would I argue about proving the existence of god on a level that is the anti-thesis to my own?
You said earlier that I think I am special when I think otherwise, earlier another poor undeveloped fool assumed I believe in miracles while another assumed that I believe divine prophecy or was a Muslim. You are using assumptions which is the true case of an idiot. You assume that something is there and are already declaring victory..........over a non-existence presence. If this is the case you are worst than Christians as you ASSUME that God does not exist.
Assumptions account for little int he real world and considering that all your actions are based from assumptions your own irreligiosity is a fallacy as it is based off similar if not identical standards of non-evidence. You believe that no god exist because only in your dream can you make such a claim. You are not Dawkins who can come to an evidential understanding that God does not exist but you are instead Lane Craig who believes the shit coming out of his own ass is gold while his mouth spews forth diamonds. You are delusional and idiotic in every sense of the way.