(April 21, 2014 at 9:10 am)Revelation777 Wrote: Evolution models of the fossil record predict the following:
- wholesale transitions in organisms over time
- primitive forms evolving into complex forms
- gradual derivation of new organisms produced transitional forms
We do not find any of these to be true based on our fossil record.
The fossil record doesn't have every single creature perfectly contained in it. Are you arguing that because we don't have the remains of any specific person, that the person didn't exist?
The problem here is you're stuck in thinking in terms of "final forms", so every time you see something, you assume it has to be a final form. Also, Faith No More provided an excellent list of many of the "intermediate forms" for you.
I imagine now you will simply declare them all "final forms", insist that all similarities between two creatures is purely coincidence, and then double our work by telling us to find more "intermediate forms" in the now doubled number of gaps.
