Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Esquilax]

I maybe mistaken but I was under the impression that most of what we know of the cambrian comes from the burgess shale in Canada and a site in china, I could be wrong. Eitherway you have a hard enough time finding sedimentary rock from the ediacarian let alone fossils from that, which as you state, likely didn't have mineralized shells.

Hey Rev? I'd like you to take a good, long look at the exchange here between Lemon and Chuck, because I think it's a great contrast between the ways we address this issue. See how the two atheists aren't talking past one another in a mad scramble to hit all their talking points, heedless of the opinions and facts being exchanged? See how they're listening to one another, taking on board what is being said and allowing the conversation to evolve beyond the surface level?

See how they've clearly done their research at sources that don't have statements of faith?

What's happening here is an actual conversation. What you've done in this thread, frankly, is an insult to our intelligence.