Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Revelation777]

Part of the problem is that you have been duped by some of the books you read. Time to wake up and smell the Truth.

WE have been duped?

At least I read books. By the looks of it, you don't. Except for one, which honestly doesn't count as something conducive to knowledge.

Since when is intelligence or knowledge correlated to the amount of books one reads?

---

Rev, keep being a jerkoff Christian posting something and then not interacting.... see if anyone will bother responding, or if ur lucky even open the other 6 nonsense, unsupported threads that u say ur gonna post.. we can start treating u like some of the banned members. ........"all you are is dust in the wind".........

Do you see the amount of posts are on this thread? I already spent a couple hours trying to respond to posts and still like ten pages to go.

---

Thank you for your recommendation. Make ya a deal, I'll read that and you read the Bible?

I've read the Bible. You're way behind the curve.

I'm glad you read it.

---

ken hams personal soap bo Wrote:
Since there is much more prestige in finding an ancestor of man than an ancestor of living apes (or worse yet, merely an extinct ape), there is immense pressure on paleoanthropologists to declare almost any ape fossil to be a “hominid.” As a result, the living apes have pretty much been left to find their own ancestors.

Apes ARE hominds, you ignorant wretch.

Boru

Woops, he had a typo, that must mean his arguments are invalid. Not a good thing to have a grammatical error on an atheist board.