Revs, back in post 237, I asked you a question that you still have not answered.
Let's say, hypothetically, in spite of your complete faith in Jesus, god and bible, these really are all lies. How would you detect the fact that these are lies?
Would you answer be "I have complete faith therefore I need no facility for detecting lies"?
If that is the case, then it would seem if Jesus, god, and bible really are lies, you would have no procedure in place to detect the lie, and therefore you would believe them whether they are true, or they are lies.
Since you would believe them even if they are lies because you have no valid, repeatable procedure to validate them, then the fact you believe them should in no way be presented an any sort of argument in favor of your belief.
What do you think?
Let's say, hypothetically, in spite of your complete faith in Jesus, god and bible, these really are all lies. How would you detect the fact that these are lies?
Would you answer be "I have complete faith therefore I need no facility for detecting lies"?
If that is the case, then it would seem if Jesus, god, and bible really are lies, you would have no procedure in place to detect the lie, and therefore you would believe them whether they are true, or they are lies.
Since you would believe them even if they are lies because you have no valid, repeatable procedure to validate them, then the fact you believe them should in no way be presented an any sort of argument in favor of your belief.
What do you think?
