Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Cyberman]

---

Of course, because to him and similar pulpit-pounders The Truth™ is directly proportional to the authority of the person speaking it. For instance, JC 'must have been' his god incarnate, or son of same, because he said so; and, being a god, wouldn't possibly lie. Therefore everything the character said is literal truth. Rev's blinkered mind is way too narrow even to consider the possibility that what's important is the validity of the words spoken, not the person speaking them. That's why he keeps hiding behind the skankily repellant child-mind-rapist Ken Ham - a self-aggrandised authority touting the god squad party line.

---

Seems like you have made some harsh judgmental statements towards people you don't share the same views towards.

Nope; only towards those who come here and judge me on why I don't share their belief. I don't go out of my way to target them. See, that's what "seems" gets you.

Understood, but for those who believe Jesus is the Son of God have received what He has said as true and live try to live their lives accordingly.

And that's the bit you and your friends fall down on - you never, or rarely ever, demonstrate any of these bald assertions and presuppositions and merely assume them to be true reflections of reality. Which is fine by itself, but it's when you leap about like a judgemental kangaroo from one pious platitude to another that I start getting pissy.

Again, you might not agree but can you respect that?

Respect what - the person, the self-justification of superiority or the belief? Be it noted that not all of those things are worthy of automatic respect.