Rev. 777,
I hope that you have ceased posting links to AIG. I have some very good solid reasons for rejecting anything that Ken Ham and the other goons at AIG say. Their statement of faith declares that they will lie in order for their findings to fit with the doctrine that they adhere to. This is, in and of itself, dis-fucking-honest.
The primary claim is that there is a magic book that is always right no matter what. A document, in the real world, cannot function that way. It's based on magical thinking. The conclusions that creationists draw from magic bookism are erroneous conclusions. In other words -- magic bookism simply does not work as a method for obtaining accurate information.
Rejecting established scientific data on the grounds that it does not conform to ancient mythology is insane. AIG is a lunatic fringe cult that is based on bullshit. It is not traditional xtianity, it is not science, it is not history -- it is Ken Ham-ism.
I hope that you have ceased posting links to AIG. I have some very good solid reasons for rejecting anything that Ken Ham and the other goons at AIG say. Their statement of faith declares that they will lie in order for their findings to fit with the doctrine that they adhere to. This is, in and of itself, dis-fucking-honest.
The primary claim is that there is a magic book that is always right no matter what. A document, in the real world, cannot function that way. It's based on magical thinking. The conclusions that creationists draw from magic bookism are erroneous conclusions. In other words -- magic bookism simply does not work as a method for obtaining accurate information.
Rejecting established scientific data on the grounds that it does not conform to ancient mythology is insane. AIG is a lunatic fringe cult that is based on bullshit. It is not traditional xtianity, it is not science, it is not history -- it is Ken Ham-ism.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste -- don't pollute it with bullshit.
