Yeah, you're under no obligation to take a presuppositionalist seriously until they can substantiate their claims. By attempting to tackle their argument seriously you're giving unjust power to their delusion that simply calling "first!" beside the concept of knowledge gives them ownership over it.
If they try to tell you reason and logic are impossible without god, then just walk away and pretend they aren't there. After all, if you can't have knowledge as an atheist, then you can't possibly know that you're talking to a presuppositional apologist, and therefore, according to their own argument, you aren't.
If they try to tell you reason and logic are impossible without god, then just walk away and pretend they aren't there. After all, if you can't have knowledge as an atheist, then you can't possibly know that you're talking to a presuppositional apologist, and therefore, according to their own argument, you aren't.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
