RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 24, 2014 at 11:50 pm
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2014 at 11:52 pm by Revelation777.)
(April 23, 2014 at 12:23 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:(April 23, 2014 at 12:22 pm)Coffee Jesus Wrote: How about we distinguish all pertinent responses to Rev with purple font. We can use normal color font as we talk amongst eachother, and Rev can just focus on the purple.I second that motion.
That's nice but we are getting off track. The original argument was about transitional fossils. We say ye?
(April 23, 2014 at 12:27 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Did we ever get an argument or evidence from a reliable unbiased source that there are no transitional fossils, to respond to the clear demonstration there are many transitional fossils?
If no, can we agree this argument has been an utter failure and poorly researched at that?
Id like to see the next argument, and it seems like rev is out of steam and just tossing assertions out with nothing to back them up.
Part of the problem lies is what you guys see as a transitional fossil, I don't. That is why we are at a standstill and we need to go to Argument #1 but I am waiting for something.