RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 25, 2014 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2014 at 12:40 am by Simon Moon.)
(April 24, 2014 at 11:50 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Part of the problem lies is what you guys see as a transitional fossil, I don't. That is why we are at a standstill and we need to go to Argument #1 but I am waiting for something.
How does Tiktaalik not fit the definition of a transitional form?
It has fins like a fish, and also has rudimentary fingers like a reptile. The head of a croc and the gills of a fish. The ability to turn its head like a reptile, shoulders like a reptile, yet has scales like a fish.
There are others, but lets start there.
Quote:And before I go, I did ask you to admit that you were wrong about the quotes that you sourced a few pages back, and that you were lied to from the people you got them from. Any progress on that basic level of accountability, Rev?
Yes rev, what about your dishonest quote mining?
Please respond.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
