Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[JuliaL]

I have some sympathy that you feel you're too overwhelmed to respond but consider where you are.
I'd still like to hear how you explain the lack of transitional forms required by the 'standard' creationist explanation of the flood story.

Some really funny stories result when creationists try to make plausible the stories of the bible. Let me help:

1) Maybe there was no lack of space in the ark for the millions of species we observe today because, like the Tardis, the ark was bigger on the inside than on the outside.
or
2) Maybe there are no observable dramatic changes in the number of species observed in the paleological record around flood time because;
a) all the millions of species existed before the flood,
b) all but the few thousand 'kinds' which made onto the ark died in the flood and
c) after the flood receded, the 'kinds' immediately spawned all the species back into existence so the period when the millions of species were collapsed into the thousands of 'kinds' is being missed by the paleontologists.
or
3) Just call it magic.