RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 25, 2014 at 9:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2014 at 9:24 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(April 25, 2014 at 8:25 pm)Godlesspanther Wrote:(April 25, 2014 at 5:44 pm)Esquilax Wrote: He'll never say this, but secretly, the answer is "nothing that any fossil will ever have." Out loud he'll give us some nonsense remarkably similar to the crocoduck, if he answers at all. Mark my words.
The creationists' definition for a 'transitional fossil' is: "if it exists it's not one."
AIG said so in overarching term. No fact can be admitted to exist which shows "scripture" to be false.
It is ironic AIG thinks their proclamation about truth of genesis could even theoretically be of any value whatsoever when they out and out admitted their proclamation would be the same regardless of whether genesis is in reality true or not.
Total dissociation from truth is in the christian mind the only way to the truth.
