RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 26, 2014 at 11:06 am
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2014 at 11:07 am by Simon Moon.)
(April 26, 2014 at 9:25 am)Rev777 Wrote: Part of the problem lies is what you guys see as a transitional fossil, I don't. That is why we are at a standstill and we need to go to Argument #1 but I am waiting for something.
Quote:What characteristics must a fossil have in order for you to consider it a transitional fossil? You've implied you're looking for specific things. What are they?
I've been wondering the same thing.
So please, Rev777, describe what you are expecting to see in a transitional form so we can all be debating the same thing.
Thanks
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.