(April 26, 2014 at 6:12 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: What you refer to as transitional fossils I consider non-transitional fossils.
So no I guess, because when I posted that post on Archeopteryx I showed why it is one. So how can Archeopteryx be just a bird if it has more theropod traits than avian ones? Why was it a prediction if evolution was not true, and was know to exist only if evolution was right before it was discovered? I even gave the definition of transitional fossil before, so I guess no matter how much evidence you will just start with point A and to hell with the rest. That in fact is intellectual dishonesty.
![[Image: guilmon_evolution_by_davidgtm3-d4gb5rp.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=orig15.deviantart.net%2F1dbf%2Ff%2F2011%2F319%2F3%2F3%2Fguilmon_evolution_by_davidgtm3-d4gb5rp.gif)