Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Rampant.A.I.]

That's a lot of ridiculous bald assertion that has absolutely nothing to do with the thread, other than the top one which already been shown is untrue, but are repeating anyway.

Darwin's fame and popularity led to his name being associated with ideas and movements which at times had only an indirect relation to his writings, and sometimes went directly against his express comments.

Apparently you not only don't know what Evolution states, but also don't know what Social Darwinism is, and couldn't bother reading anything about it.

Writers used natural selection to argue for various, often contradictory, ideologies such as laissez-faire dog-eat dog capitalism, racism, warfare, colonialism and imperialism. However, Darwin's holistic view of nature included "dependence of one being on another"; thus pacifists, socialists, liberal social reformers and anarchists such as Peter Kropotkin stressed the value of co-operation over struggle within a species.[179] Darwin himself insisted that social policy should not simply be guided by concepts of struggle and selection in nature.[180]

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin