(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 1. If anything is pro intelligent design some posters here judge it as deceitful, bias, slanted, a piece of rubbish.No, Rev. Do you just plug your ears and eyes and disregard everything that challenges your current beliefs? Do you not let anything in? Things are not disregarded because they are 'pro intelligent design,' they are disregarded because they are shown conclusively to be misrepresentative of the facts. Because they are shown to be duplicitous, and doing bad science.
(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 2. If Richard Dawkins passes gas it is held as doctrine.Not even close. He is merely an example of a person who has cogently put together arguments against religion and laid out the facts and evidence of evolution. I disagree with his vitriol and his method at times.
(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 3. If I suggest a movie some of you guys ferret through the internet looking for negative reviewsYou conveniently ignored the fact that several of us actually watched the movie (myself being one of them.) I provided my own review that had no basis in anything I read online.
(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 4. I get a pro-creation perspective and I am using unreliable unqualified sourcesThis is because as has pointed out to you many, many times, you are using a source that has already made up its mind about what the evidence says before they even look at the evidence.
(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 5. Wake up folks, Jews and Christians historically have been the most persecuted people ever.Jews may be. Don't lump yourself in with them to make yourself out to be a martyr. Your particular brand of religion is (and continues to be) responsible for more persecution than any other.
(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 6. Hitler tried to push forward eugenics which was developed by Francis Galton - his half cousin was Darwin. Surprise, surprise - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EugenicsThis is a complete non sequitir, Rev. What are you suggesting? That somehow Darwin was responsible for the Holocaust because some psychopathic Christian used the theory of his relative? What? You know, you have cried on this thread for us calling you an idiot or ignorant or stupid---but you continuously show us stuff like this.
(April 26, 2014 at 9:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: 7. Ben Stein is an absolutely brilliant man, and I don't say that because of his views.Ben Stein is actually a smart person. He is. He is also bat shit crazy. He made a movie---that of course you ate up---that is all about people who cheated and got caught. They tried to make up their own rules for an already established game, and then cried when everybody stuck to the original rules.
Rev, you have completely disappointed me. You have lied, misrepresented nearly everything you've posted, not responded to anything that is challenging, and then acted like a martyr when you are called out on your bullshit. That is sad. You are willfully ignoring anything that is difficult to answer. That is dishonest. You are posting the same thing over and over. That is what makes us think you are dumb.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---