(April 27, 2014 at 3:34 pm)Deidre32 Wrote: True, but she's suing for 'mental anguish,' etc. I get it, but give me a break. She's still living. The kid she hit isn't.
She can counter sue to protect her assets, I get that, too. But, suing for her mental anguish is trying to profit off someone's loss. That's what is disgusting.
No doubt she has mental anguish, but somehow, I think the mother and father who lost their child, are suffering worse.
Yeah, it's complete bullshit to counter-sue for mental anguish because you hit someone. But we have a bullshit justice system, so, she could win.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
