Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Mister Agenda]

1. If anything is pro intelligent design some posters here judge it as deceitful, bias, slanted, a piece of rubbish.

It's not the pro intelligent design part that's the criteria for coming to that conclusion.

2. If Richard Dawkins passes gas it is held as doctrine.

Dawkins gets plenty of criticism when he says something stupid, which is not terribly infrequent. A man his age probably shouldn't be allowed to have a Twitter account. And this objection is irrelevant.

3. If I suggest a movie some of you guys ferret through the internet looking for negative reviews.

No ferreting required. Particularly in the case of Expelled, it was quickly infamous when it came out, and heavily discussed around here. Maybe you shouldn't have assumed we're not familiar with it.

4. I get a pro-creation perspective and I am using unreliable unqualified sources

Your whining seems to be getting repetitive at this point. Again, it's not the perspective that leads to the conclusion, it's the demonstrated mendacity.

5. Wake up folks, Jews and Christians historically have been the most persecuted people ever.

And the most persecuting. Except for Quakers.

6. Hitler tried to push forward eugenics which was developed by Francis Galton - his half cousin was Darwin. Surprise, surprise - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

It doesn't take evolution to arrive at eugenics, a basic understanding of animal husbandry is sufficient.

7. Ben Stein is an absolutely brilliant man, and I don't say that because of his views.

Ben Stein is well-educated and has a good memory, but if he's so brilliant, why did he make such a profoundly bad documentary?