Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Esquilax]

I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

No. You're not done here.

This is actually true, Rev: though you're attempting to cut and run, the fact is that you have presented demonstrably untrue claims and largely dishonest and inaccurate quote attributions in an attempt to bolster your argument, and at no point have you ever owned up to posting creationist quote mines and fallacies, nor have you so much as admitted that your claims thus far have been wrong.

You've just tap danced around taking responsibility for anything that you've done here, and now you're intending to just sweep that under the rug and move on, presumably to do exactly the same thing.

I'm not against you making new threads, but I will point out that you've started out with some absolutely terrible behavior, even disregarding the paucity of factual arguments, and if you're intending to continue in a spirit of dishonesty and willful ignorance without so much as admitting your objective fault here, then you aren't exactly giving us a reason to engage with you in future.

I'd encourage you not to respond to this with yet another single sentence answer about wishing to bring people to Christ or whatever, and instead to really reflect on your actions here; you have been demonstrably wrong on several points, and at best the victim of someone else's lies on others.

Why won't you even admit that?