Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Crossless2.0]

False accusations, Rev? Really? You have copied/pasted walls of text without attribution from creationist sites. Those same sites make an explicit point of saying that they will not consider any evidence that they cannot square with their presupposition that the Bible is the inerrant word of their god, and to that end they will (as has been repeatedly demonstrated in this thread and elsewhere) lie about the nature of the evidence, twist and distort facts, and indulge in dishonest quote mining. Though this has been explained to you repeatedly, you will not acknowledge how sleazy and dishonest their tactics are, and you seem utterly unashamed to have used such bogus sites to represent your position. At no point have you demonstrated that you have even the barest understanding of the science you presume to dismiss. And when others have taken the trouble to correct you, your responses have been throw-away one-liners.

Has mendacity always come so easily to you, or did you have to get religion to learn to be so clueless and dishonest?

Oh, and how is that book by Prothero coming for you? You know the one: you said you'd read it if I read the Bible. Well, I have so it's your turn. Or was that just another of your lies? Since the only way I can get much of a response from you is to offend your too-sensitive feelings about old Anglo-Saxon words, allow me to add: Fuck you. Looking forward to your response.