Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Esquilax]

You should debate him?

Why would I do that? Why would I debate a man who openly lies in defense of his faith, and what reason would I have to think he wouldn't continue to lie in a debate with me, if he would do so so readily on film? It's probably not much fun to go up against someone who'll make stuff up at the drop of a hat; maybe you should look up the "Gish gallop" to see how well that goes for people like me who are actually interested in the truth, rather than winning.

I will point out to those who have forgotten, though, that I still have a debate challenge open for you to take, Rev. That's because I don't think you're lying, at least not actively; I think you've been taken in by conmen and lack any interest in hearing how they have lied, but intellectual incuriosity and laziness isn't quite as bad a sin as outright dishonesty.