I believe in God: So Debate me

[Rampant.A.I.]

I'm still wondering how Mahmoud A Dinnerjacket here differentiates between the god he claims exists and other supernatural entities. Coincidentally, it just happens to be the God he was raised to believe in.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I will treat you as an idiot(which you are) from here on out and forever.

Ok, if that's your fallback when you're unable to substantiate your beliefs, you can cling to it if you like.

1. I was never raised to believe in the god I believe.

It's just coincidental that the God you believe in happens to be a popular one in your particular culture.

2. I do not differentiate shit.

Yes, and that's the problem. You cannot explain why your God is real, and other Gods are not, when all Gods have the same lack of evidence.

3. I do not even believe in "supernatural entities"

Yes you do. You believe in God, which is by definition a supernatural entity.

4. Coincidentally the god I believe in has nothing to do with anything I was ever taught.

So you admittedly make shit up and present it as fact, then laugh, gibber, and fling your own excrement when people ask you to support your claims.

5. You assume to much and are thus objectively stupid.

Sorry, don't speak word salad.

6. You are worthless and if eugenics was brought back you would be the first to go.

Perhaps you should declare a jihad on me. Otherwise, as someone who apparently supports eugenics, I suggest you make a pencil disappear using your eye socket forthwith.

He's not arguing (very well at all) for the Christian God, Hindu God, or a general bland creator deity. No, those Gods don't exist; but Allah does.

I have been a Christian, Hindu and Muslim in the past although my brush with Hinduism was more intellectual and I have only truly been a Christian and a Muslim.

I'm sure each time you were as objectively bad at supporting the reasoning for your beliefs as you are now.

Why? How do you know it's Allah?

I never said god is objectivelly called Allah it is just the fact that the world Allah is unisex. Al-ilah is male and al-Ilaha is female and Allah is unisex. It is just the best word possible to remove gender. Sikhs use the word Allah, as do Christians and Muslims. But Allah is a pagan name with pagan connotations.

"God" is by definition a unisex name. An omnipresent being cannot have gender.

Oh look, more cultural coincidences:

The term Allāh is derived from a contraction of the Arabic definite article al- "the" and ilāh "deity, god" to al-lāh meaning "the [sole] deity, God" (ὁ θεὸς μόνος, ho theos monos).[11] Cognates of the name "Allāh" exist in other Semitic languages, including Hebrew and Aramaic.[12] The corresponding Aramaic form is ʼĔlāhā in Biblical Aramaic and ʼAlâhâ in Syriac as used by the Assyrian Church, both meaning simply 'God'.[13]

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah

What compels any of us to give more credence to
the alternate form of the God character the Christians stole from the Jews, and the Islamics stole from the Christians?

I have never asked for any credence from you. I am not exactly asking for inferior biological units to acknowledge me so I sure as hell do not care about your concerns towards my convictions.
The Muhammadians stole Allah from the pagans and fused Judaism and Christianity into it. So you are historically wrong on that bit by the way but I cannot expect much from something like yourself obviously .

Yet you keep making assertions like the above, and throw a screaming tantrum whenever anyone disagrees.

It seems you do expect acceptance of your assertions, and are unable to support them by any method other then hissy fit.

Why does that intangible supernatural being with no evidence exist, but other supernatural beings do not?

Why do multiple hypothesis exist for the Abiogenesis process? Why do multiple models and theories exist to explain it? Why do multiple religions exist to explain God(who I dubbed Allah)?

False comparison. Abiogenesis theories are based on empirical evidence. Gods are based on cultural mythology and superstition, and lack empirical evidence.

I have only concluded 5 things about God

1. All religions are wrong
2. Only Natural Theologies hold actual understanding of god
3. Each of these natural theologies should be taken as theoretical approaches to the Divinity Dilemma.
4. My own(along with others) theology seems the most plausible.
5. Because of it's plausibility I apply it to the natural world.

There you go again, presenting your beliefs as facts with zero support, demanding we accept your conclusions.

I doubt you will understand that because you are not very bright, could be inbreeding maybe or retardation but who knows.

I would be considerably less bright of I accepted the incoherent rantings of an internet troll unquestioningly.

I think you need a new can of Gusto. Yours appears to be empty.

Just got a new can . I got re-motivated today after listening to one of my favorite Sikhs.

[youtube]IlAJosw3Q3o[/youtube]

Yet incapable of putting it into your own words, apparently.

Here you go again: