Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

[Rampant.A.I.]

Argument #2: Evolution of Species

The evolutionist Kerkut defined the “general theory of evolution” as “the theory that living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.”

Well that's stupid, as he's referring to abiogenesis, and not evolution.

Seems you got your definition from:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Definition_of_evolution

And the use of this "evolutionist" term is a clear indicator of a misunderstanding of basic biological science, as in:

Evolutionism, as opposed to Creationism, is the advocacy of or belief in biological evolution.[1] Therefore one who believes in or supports a theory of evolution[2] would be referred to as an evolutionist. Evolutionism, used in a general sense, encompasses any type of biological evolutionist. Broken down into two categories, "Evolutionism" and "Evolutionists" usually involve Atheistic/Agnostic Evolutionists (evolution without God) and Theistic Evolutionists (evolution with God). Those categories can be further broken down, but they are the main two.

Where there is no disagreement between the basic scientific fact of evolution accepted by biology and medical science. The only "disagreement" comes from "Intelligent Design" advocates, who have no scientific findings save from what they've stolen from biologists, and no alternative theories other than "No, but God did it using magic instead," and fabricate lies like the "macro vs micro evolution" distinction, and are not taken seriously by a single scientific institution worldwide, due in no small part to their status as known presumptive liars pretending to be scientists.

So, no disrespect intended, but it seems your argument #2 is indeed a looped gif of a bull defecating.



Congrats on that.