(May 5, 2014 at 10:27 am)Revelation777 Wrote:(May 4, 2014 at 11:35 pm)Chuck Wrote: Revs speaks of "his argument". It appears revs thinks so long as he can imagine he is in the make belief good graces of the fictional Jesus, any shit he care to lay in public in a sorry attempt to buttress his fantasy would constitute "an argument".
Instead of putting me down, try addressing the argument.
(May 4, 2014 at 10:49 pm)Stimbo Wrote: So your entire second argument is built upon the definition of a phrase mined from a single 50-something-year-old book by one zoologist?
Wait while I get the popcorn.
Try focusing on the issue that I brought up instead of focusing on a missed dotted "i" or a slanted crossed "t".
Your joking, right? You posted the *opinion* of one person, quote mined from a 54 year old book, that ignores all of the substantial research that's been done since.
There is literally nothing to address. Your source is obsolete.