(May 5, 2014 at 11:02 am)Revelation777 Wrote:(May 4, 2014 at 11:50 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Yep. It's a transparent one and extremely dishonest.
Part of the problem is that there is a pressure in the scientific community to fall in line with evolution or jeopardize your credibility, lose your funding, and be ostracized.
Even if that were true (it isn't), what does that have to do with you dishonestly quote mining woefully out of date *opinions* as if they have any relevance today?