Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

[Esquilax]

Part of the problem is that there is a pressure in the scientific community to fall in line with evolution or jeopardize your credibility, lose your funding, and be ostracized.

The fact that you keep claiming this just shows that you aren't listening to a damn thing anybody else is saying to you.

Once again: there is no conspiracy to silence creationism in science, it's just that there is no evidence for creationism, and there is mountains of evidence for evolution, whether you want to accept that or not. If a creationist wants to be taken seriously, they should start by furnishing evidence for their beliefs, something they never do; do you understand how much things would change if anyone could actually demonstrate creationism, or overturn evolution? That's an immense discovery, that completely alters the course of over a century of scientific knowledge and enterprise; that level of finding is Nobel Prize winning stuff, and that's even discounting all the funding those scientists would get from the multi-million dollar religious lobbyists for that research.

When you say things like you're saying, you are claiming that there's a conspiracy among scientists, many of whom are religious, across the entire world, that gives no benefit to those doing the conspiring, and actively stops them from earning millions of dollars and being world famous, prize winning super geniuses. It's just absurd.

Rev: Read this post. Listen. Respond after thinking. Don't just follow Ben Stein, he is a liar.