Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

[The Valkyrie]

So, after having been told why Answers In Genesis is not a reliable, unbiased source, you link to a site that recommends AiG as a source?

Really?

Really?

I found something interesting that I would like to share with my skeptical atheist friends -

1997-NOV data is little changed. Note the massive differences between the beliefs of the general population and of scientists:

Group Creation Theistic Evolution Evolution
Everyone 44% 39% 10%
Scientists 5% 40% 55%

http://www.ridgecrest.ca.us/~do_while/sage/v5i10f.htm

So you see that there are scientists who do believe in creation. Also, note that the general public only 10% believe in evolution without God's intervention. If you visit this website they also have a list of scientists who embrace creation. This is wonderful news.

And very few of those "scientists" will be evolutionary biologists.

And, as previously stated, science doesn't depend on numbers to be factual.

Going back, once the majority of Europeans thought the world was flat. They were wrong, too.

And I would suggest you google "Project Steve".