RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2014 at 8:58 pm by Cyberman.)
(May 5, 2014 at 8:45 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: So you see that there are scientists who do believe in creation. Also, note that the general public only 10% believe in evolution without God's intervention. If you visit this website they also have a list of scientists who embrace creation. This is wonderful news.
Rev - how many times do you need to be told that the truth or otherwise is not decided by opinion? It doesn't matter what these scientists believe - what counts, all that counts, is what they can demonstrate. Nor is truth dependent on the authority of the person speaking it. Einstein was also a practising alchemist; does that mean that we should believe in the Philosopher's Stone too?
I'm also wondering what any of this has to do with your current "argument". You remember? The one you gave such a buildup to last week.
I'll give you this, though... you're fond of your red herrings.
Edit to accomodate late-breaking news:
(May 5, 2014 at 8:53 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: You guys have dismissed my argument so we now are on a tangent.
You're actually conceding this?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
