(May 10, 2014 at 1:10 pm)eyemixer Wrote: In fairness to Rev, he has not yet responded to my question if inter breeding is the only requirement for a 'kind'. If so, your argument stands, if not, additional requirements to be in the same 'kind' can be added forever and the goal posts never get set.
That said, if Rev is unwilling to respond to my multiple requests for HIS definition of what a 'kind' is, your accusation of him intentionally failing to provide a definition for 'kind' in order to disingenuously shift the goalposts becomes impossible to invalidate.
Given that it's the first concrete detail we've gotten out of Rev regarding an area of biology, and not merely regarding his faith, I'm willing to jump on what I can get with gusto. Especially when we're discussing "kinds," a term built from the ground up to be a slippery, ill defined mess to throw real people off the scent.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!