RE: JC wasn't crucified, says 1500-year-old bible
May 15, 2014 at 9:39 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2014 at 9:43 pm by Mudhammam.)
The original link appears broken so I went Googling. Is this the same thing?
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/...430464.htm
"The 52-page Bible is written in Aramaic, the language Jesus spoke, and consists the depiction of the Last Supper, which shows Jesus dining with his 12 Apostles, and also a depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus, a symbol of the sun and a cross, according to Turkish newspaper Today's Zaman."
Even if it did exclude the crucifixion of Jesus, that's long been a denial of Muslim belief, and 1,500 years ago puts us around the time when Muslims may have recorded or strongly influenced such a work about Jesus.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/...430464.htm
"The 52-page Bible is written in Aramaic, the language Jesus spoke, and consists the depiction of the Last Supper, which shows Jesus dining with his 12 Apostles, and also a depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus, a symbol of the sun and a cross, according to Turkish newspaper Today's Zaman."
Even if it did exclude the crucifixion of Jesus, that's long been a denial of Muslim belief, and 1,500 years ago puts us around the time when Muslims may have recorded or strongly influenced such a work about Jesus.
