(May 17, 2014 at 7:29 am)Heywood Wrote: Further you have no way of controlling God's actions.
Yet, that is precisely what theists do. Theists have no evidence to even support god's existence, yet they control him as though his existence is a fact despite the underwhelming evidence.
(May 17, 2014 at 7:29 am)Heywood Wrote: Suppose I pray for my dying father.
That is what it all boils down to, is it not? Suppose. One must suppose that god exists, for you have no evidence to provide for his existence. If one can suppose something exists without evidence, then one can equally, though more logically, suppose that something does not exist when there is no evidence to support its existence.
You must think me dreadfully dull to continually refer back to proving that god exists, but I refuse to argue anymore in regards to something that has absolutely no proof to support its existence. If you want to debate a subject, I will suggest, not suppose, that you must first prove the subject of your argument exists before infringing upon logic for the sake of an absurd claim.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter