(May 18, 2014 at 2:46 am)Esquilax Wrote: Nice of you to just baldly assert that.![]()
But in the real world, if there's no failure state for a claim, then there's no way to test that claim, and hence no possibility of being rationally justified in believing it. You theists are committed to retracting every possible failure state for your claims as though that somehow makes them bulletproof, when in actuality all it does is make them untestable and pointless.
You've moved the goal post yet again. Before it was logically valid...now it is rationally justified in believing it. "Logically valid" is not even close to being the same as "rationally justified in believing it". You know I don't like to argue with you because you play these games all the time while accusing your opponents of doing the same.