RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 4:30 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2014 at 4:33 am by pocaracas.)
(May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am)snowtracks Wrote: evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
Damn! It's a good thing they don't base their classification solely on craniodental characters, huh?