RE: Does it make sense to speak of "Universal Consciousness" or "Univer...
May 20, 2014 at 1:10 pm
(May 20, 2014 at 11:12 am)ChadWooters Wrote: "I agree that by the standards of any other area of science, psi - that is ESP, remote viewing, all those things - is proven. That begs the question, do we need higher standards of evidence when we study the paranormal?" Dr. Richard Wiseman, noted skeptic.
In other words, no matter how solid the proof, he will demand more because it challenges his belief about how the world should work. It just goes to show, Chas, that your commitment to science is just an argument of convenience. You're antiscience when it suits you.
Quote:before the quote, you conveniently left out:
Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing.
and then after the quote:
"If I said that there is a red car outside my house, you would probably believe me.
"But if I said that a UFO had just landed, you'd probably want a lot more evidence.
"Because remote viewing is such an outlandish claim that will revolutionise the world, we need overwhelming evidence before we draw any conclusions. Right now we don't have that evidence."
http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/forum/v...ba6b#p4724
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)