RE: A reason to believe?
April 30, 2010 at 4:22 am
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2010 at 4:37 am by fr0d0.)
(April 30, 2010 at 3:05 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:You're a fucking idiot ...I've concluded(April 29, 2010 at 6:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Because a belief in God intrinsically embraces positivity whereas a purely naturalist worldview would be balanced with no bias.
Epic FAIL
(April 29, 2010 at 6:58 pm)Ace Wrote:Try addressing the point.(April 29, 2010 at 6:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Because a belief in God intrinsically embraces positivity whereas a purely naturalist worldview would be balanced with no bias.
Bullshit. Bollocks on a huge scale
You don't know how others feel or how exactly they view the world. You assume people who believe in god tend to be more positive. But there is nothing to back that up.
I seriously doubt that believing in god makes you more...positive or appreciative of life than someone who doesn't believe in god.
It's about how you view the world and live your life and not what belief system your part of.
Gonna need a far better reason to believe in god.
We're not talking about individual accomplishment... we're talking about reason to believe.
You seriously doubt it, but you don't know. And you refuse to accept that having a positive basis produces a different effect to no basis?? If you're going to deny reason to that extreme I guess there's no changing your mind.
It's about your outlook on life.
Let me guess that you as an atheist think you're being realistic in accepting what nature throws at you... both good and bad. Shit happens right? Logically you reason cause and effect.
Christianity divides positive and negative, embracing positivity. Shit still happens. Realism is still invoked. Logical reasoning is effected to positive result.
Can you see how it's different?