An unorthodox belief in God.

[Ravenshire]

In my view, 24 pages of it.

Get your eyes checked!

---

Okay, fine. Now we're going to play it this way.

God doesn't exist. The fact that we live in a natural world is proof of that.

We do not live in a natural world, its a created world

Evidence or shut the fuck up!

The fact that evolution is a sufficient cause of the diversity of life on earth is proof of that.

Evolution is a tool that the designer of earth uses to change his creations; tweak them

Evidence or shut the fuck up!

The fact that abiogenesis is a sufficient cause for the beginning of life is proof of that.

I do not believe in abiogenesis, but I accept biogenesis.

What?!? You accept but don't believe?!? It either happened or it didn't. You can't have it both ways.

The fact that we clearly don't live in a creation as the majority of the universe is outright fatal to life is proof of that.

I have no idea what this means

Color me un-surprised

The fact that something can come from nothing is proof of that. The fact that god isn't real is proof of that.

Something cannot come from nothing, and there is no proof that god is not real.

You've already been given evidence that something can indeed come from nothing. Your continued use of this claim is now outright lying unless and until you can refute that evidence. Of course, I'm sure you never bothered to examine that evidence.

That's what you think evidence is, right? Well, now you can refute all of that evidence I just laid out, because those are all facts, and now you have to deal with that.

mickiel, you are one of the most thick-headed, intellectually dishonest people it has ever been my misfortune to encounter. Please keep the humor coming. As My dad always told me: "If you can't laugh at yourself, pick someone else and laugh at them." mickiel, I've nominated you!

---

When will you actually provide some. No, that stuff you're pulling out of your ass doesn't count!

I am willing to bet that mickiel has many things he does not believe exist; UFO abductions, bigfoot, Loch Ness monster, Chupacabra, etc, etc.

And I'm also willing to bet that he disbelieves many of these things for good reason; lack of demonstrable evidence being the main one.

Yet he doesn't examine his own, unsupported beliefs with the same level of scrutiny as he does these other claims.

Now of course, I could be completely wrong, and he's even more gullible than I think.

At this point it wouldn't surprise me to find that he believes wholeheartedly in all of those along with all the other (non-religious) myths and monsters. He probably also believes Dungeons and Dragons includes real spell books with spells that really work.