Q about arguments for God's existence.
June 15, 2014 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: June 15, 2014 at 12:40 am by Rampant.A.I..)
(June 14, 2014 at 10:48 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(June 13, 2014 at 10:39 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: I'm sorry you haven't bothered to research anything to do with astrophysics, and are throwing a defensive tantrum to make yourself feel better about it.
Speaking of bullshit claims, didn't you claim the Big Bang is a Catholic origin myth, when it predates Catholicism by thousands of years in Vedic beliefs?
Might as well start insulting me for not believing 9-11 was an "inside job," or believing the moon landing happened.
Since it was a Catholic priest who publicized the Big Bang and got the local yokels to believe while the Vedics kept it to themselves I'll give the Catholic priest the credit. Too bad the Vedics never got a copyright.
The Big Bang is only applicable on an individual star basis when it goes supernova. It doesn't work for the universe. And even then it has to be modified in order to fit supernova physics.
The Chinese claim that they will soon go to the moon. We'll see how they do. We should have sold them the blueprints. It could have helped reduced the deficit.
He was also an astrophysicist.
The theory of a religious cosmology dates to the Vedics.
You're tracing a theory proposed to an astrophysicist, and claiming it's invalid because the astrophysicist happened to be Catholic.
If so, we should also throw out Hubble's Law, and the Hubble Constant.
Should we throw out the methodology and data gathered by the Human Genome Project since Francis Collins is an Evangelical?
