A Serious Question For Theists

[Jackalope]

Theoretical in science, correct me if I'm wrong, is more that unsupported conjecture.

I'm not saying that most people aren't well balanced/able to use both empiricism and rationalism. I'm picking on the idea that you can deny rationalism on its own.

---

Disregarding the "purely" term, provided it really is rational and is based on (or confirmed by) empirical evidence, then yes.

But as for purely rational problem, provide an example so I know what you're on about.

So without the empirical evidence you cannot be rational. Bingo. You are said mono atheist.

Belief in God is purely rational. You cannot have empirical evidence. You can only gather information and consider it rationally. If you cannot fault it then you can trust it. If you trust it you can act on it. If you act on it you believe in God.

How precisely does one gather information without using one's senses? It's my contention that rationalism and empiricism cannot stand alone - or at the very least, are weak when they do.

I'll also note that I've yet to see you put forth a sound rational argument for belief.