RE: Is "empty space" empty (only reasonable answers)
June 19, 2014 at 1:24 am
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2014 at 1:32 am by ignoramus.)
By empty you mean it needs to actually contain nothing? Or not contain nothing?
My argument with the galaxy expanding, is that it can only expand into something.
Like having a virtual OS residing not on a fixed partition, but a dynamic partition.
The OS will expand as needed.
But with this example, there is somewhere to expand to, until the hard disk runs out of space.
With the universe, I don't believe it is like this. There is no "real finite hard disk" to fill up.
To me nothing means void.
Void may exist which spontaneously created the BB, but's that's a different line of thought.
Therefore, based on void being nothing, it has always existed, so the matter/energy are free to travel through effortlessly.
After reading through it, I've realised that I have contradicted myself.
I blame that on myself for not defining things properly and also the lack of the language... Mine anyway.
Also with a little sprinkling of crazy and stupid.
My argument with the galaxy expanding, is that it can only expand into something.
Like having a virtual OS residing not on a fixed partition, but a dynamic partition.
The OS will expand as needed.
But with this example, there is somewhere to expand to, until the hard disk runs out of space.
With the universe, I don't believe it is like this. There is no "real finite hard disk" to fill up.
To me nothing means void.
Void may exist which spontaneously created the BB, but's that's a different line of thought.
Therefore, based on void being nothing, it has always existed, so the matter/energy are free to travel through effortlessly.
After reading through it, I've realised that I have contradicted myself.
I blame that on myself for not defining things properly and also the lack of the language... Mine anyway.
Also with a little sprinkling of crazy and stupid.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Know God, Know fear.
