Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 2, 2025, 7:47 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is "empty space" empty (only reasonable answers)
#8
RE: Is "empty space" empty (only reasonable answers)
Assuming the universe keeps expanding, space becomes increasingly more empty. Stars burn out, the rate of new stars forming is decreasing, Hawking showed us how even enormously large black holes can eventually 'evaporate', and the universal expansion continues. The time scales are staggering (really) but the universe is dissipating. Whatever someone's definition of 'empty' is, the universe will eventually reach it, and continue on into even emptier and emptier states.

The expansion of the universe also robs photons of their energy. They become weaker, and weaker as the eons accumulate. Eventually you get to a state where a volume the size of the universe today contains but a single, vanishingly weak photon, and the expansion goes on and on from there.

Also, at these low densities, and profoundly dissipated energy, Heisenberg's little caveat takes hold and any particle that is left will 'dissipate' too. As something cools, it's energy is more and more precisely known, that is, as the temperature approaches absolute zero, recall zero is an extremely precise number. Therefore, as the item's energy becomes more and more precise, it's location becomes more and more vague. The particle, when cold enough, and the universe will evolve to that point, and orders and orders of magnitude further and further, will essentially erase itself over a larger and larger volume. These volumes grow without limit as the universe gets enormously larger, colder, and emptier.

Even time starts to malfunction under these conditions, there being less and less of anything left for it to impinge upon. It's progression becomes immeasurable and erratic . . .


The exact opposite of a Big Bang, an ultimately unending thinning out, cooling off, super colossal expansion, and time fails, kind of a downbeat and boring end.

And if one looks upon such a long term burnout from the perspective of 'infinity', the universe isn't even a blip, it's nothing, because, on average, it averages out to, from that infinite viewpoint, absolutely nothing.

Really.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Is "empty space" empty (only reasonable answers) - by vorlon13 - June 19, 2014 at 10:45 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  James Webb Space Telescope pics pocaracas 18 4065 December 8, 2022 at 3:00 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  A Simple Demonstration of Space/Time Relativity Rhondazvous 14 3311 August 26, 2019 at 10:38 pm
Last Post: Vince
  Space Shuttle video site zebo-the-fat 0 605 October 6, 2018 at 1:07 pm
Last Post: zebo-the-fat
  No perfect circles in space... Jehanne 42 9149 July 23, 2018 at 7:30 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Trump space force: US to set up sixth military branch zebo-the-fat 47 9240 June 22, 2018 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  How Do Scientists Know It's Space Expanding Not Galaxies Moving? Rhondazvous 43 11827 August 18, 2017 at 10:53 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Space-Time: The Bopdie Twins: If Space is Expanding Isn't Time Expandin Too? Rhondazvous 14 2148 August 2, 2017 at 8:06 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  POLL: Is Space Continuous or Discrete? Severan 4 2112 July 14, 2017 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Iroscato
  What Did Einstein Mean when He Said Space is Curved? Rhondazvous 33 12560 June 16, 2017 at 9:46 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Which space mission would you choose? Fake Messiah 30 3804 March 29, 2017 at 4:59 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)