There can be no real argument that the N-word is offensive, regardless of context. The fact that it was allowed to be used as an article headline betrays a significant lapse in judgement, not the existence of racism in its user. Even if it were equivalent to racism, to then indict an entire group of people by association based on similar political views betrays an infantile reasoning capability.
You are right to claim that use of the N-word is not context specific regarding its ability to cause legitimate offense; however, context is key in understanding reaction to its use. Your reaction is simple deflection of the 'well, they do it too' sort. As misplaced as it was, the author's use of the word was meant to be provocative in order to draw attention to the overt racism displayed by Tea Party types.
You are lost if you equivocate Collier's use of the N-word with typical Tea Party tactics. But I suppose you think a small horde of people showing up in a black man's backyard with Confederate flags demanding he leave is an appropriate way to disagree with policy positions.
You are right to claim that use of the N-word is not context specific regarding its ability to cause legitimate offense; however, context is key in understanding reaction to its use. Your reaction is simple deflection of the 'well, they do it too' sort. As misplaced as it was, the author's use of the word was meant to be provocative in order to draw attention to the overt racism displayed by Tea Party types.
You are lost if you equivocate Collier's use of the N-word with typical Tea Party tactics. But I suppose you think a small horde of people showing up in a black man's backyard with Confederate flags demanding he leave is an appropriate way to disagree with policy positions.
